A response to the information confusion on the DAO attack
This is a response post to the article “Understanding The DAO Hack for Journalists“ I’m surprised of how much errors are in this piece written for journalists. I understand that this is a complicated ongoing topic, but its important to get the information right here. So i will point out just a few things which are definitely wrong: Correcting the article At the time, more than 50 project proposals were waiting for The DAO’s token holders to vote on them. Thats not really true, no proposal was whitelisted by the curators, so DTH could not vote on anything, except informal proposals going to the DAO itself: One can see all …